A worker, being released on his own request, retains his right to leave at work for 2 weeks
The right to leave at work is retained for a worker who has warned the owner or his authorized body of release on his own will, during the two-week period.
Therefore, the dismissal of an employee within a two-week period after filing an application for his release on his own will violates his right to withdraw such a statement and to remain at work.
The only exception is when another person was invited to his place, which, according to the law, can not be refused the conclusion of an employment contract.
This was indicated by the Supreme Court, maintaining the decision of the courts of the previous instances on the renewal of the employee who was dismissed in this way at work.
Information for notaries: charging for use of registers
The Notary Chamber of Ukraine has prepared an information letter regarding the size of the fee for actions in the Heritage Register, the Unified Register of Power of Attorney, the State Register of Encumbrances of Movable Property, and certain issues of collecting an administrative fee for obtaining information from the State Register of Real Property Rights to Real Estate.
The Minor Case is insignificant by its character, despite the fact it wass recognized / not recognized as such by a court
As you know, minor cases are not subject to appeal. The Supreme Court, in the composition of the Cassation Court, recalled the signs of such insignificant cases.
Under the circumstances of the case, the individual filed a lawsuit against the public organization regarding the recognition of the illegal and the abolition of the decision of the presidium of the PO on the increase of membership fee.
The courts of both the first and the second instances denied access to the suit. And then the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.
The SC has returned a cassation appeal due to the "mismatch" of the lawyer's order
The Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court returned a complaint to the lawyer on the grounds that his order indicated the representation of interests in the Supreme Court of Ukraine.
Indemnity of expenses for payment of legal aid should be brought by the party who has submitted the petition
According to the requirements of Article 126 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine, the costs associated with the legal assistance of an attorney are borne by the parties, except for the provision of legal aid at the expense of the state. According to the results of the consideration of the case, the expenses for the professional legal assistance of the lawyer shall be distributed among the parties, together with other legal expenses.
At the same time, in accordance with Article 129 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine, the court fee is seized: in disputes arising during the conclusion, modification and termination of contracts - from a party that unreasonably refuses to accept the proposals of the other party, or on both sides, if the court rejected a part of the proposals of each from the parties; in disputes arising from the execution of contracts and for other reasons - from the parties in proportion to the size of the satisfactory claims.
